FinTech Fraud Detection & Risk Analytics
Dataset: 5,000 Transactions  |  Period: Jan–Dec 2024  |  Analyst: Priyanka Chaudhari
Power BI Dashboard Mockup
Last Refreshed: Dec 2024
📊 Executive Overview
🏪 Merchant Risk Scorecard
⏱ Time & Amount Analysis
🔽 Filters: Clear filters
Total Transactions
5,000
Jan–Dec 2024
Fraud Count
911
Flagged transactions
▲ ELEVATED
Fraud Rate %
18.2%
Benchmark: < 2%
9× INDUSTRY AVG
Total Fraud Exposure
$1.63M
Of $7.50M total volume
21.7% of volume
Fraud Rate % by Merchant Category Ordered by risk
Monthly Fraud Rate % - 2024 12-month trend
Risk Tier Summary Based on merchant_category fraud rate thresholds: HIGH >40% | MEDIUM >20% | LOW ≤20%
Key Finding: Crypto and Suspicious/Unknown Vendor categories both exceed 56% fraud rate, these 2 categories account for 62% of total fraud exposure ($828K of $1.63M). Immediate merchant-level controls targeting these categories would have the highest impact per dollar of compliance investment. Time-based rule (1AM–4AM + amount >$500) estimated to reduce exposure by an additional 35%.
Fraud Exposure by Category ($) Total dollar exposure
Merchant Risk Scorecard v_merchant_risk_scorecard view
CategoryTotal TxnsFraud TxnsFraud RateExposureRisk
Crypto41623957.5%$425KHIGH
Suspicious41323556.9%$403KHIGH
ATM39212130.9%$230KMED
Subscription4254410.4%$79KLOW
Fuel428399.1%$77KLOW
Travel393348.7%$58KLOW
eCommerce441388.6%$70KLOW
Retail412276.6%$57KLOW
Scorecard Finding: 2 of 12 categories are HIGH RISK (Crypto 57.5%, Suspicious 56.9%). 1 category is MEDIUM RISK (ATM 30.9%). The remaining 9 categories all fall below 11%, confirming that fraud is highly concentrated, not systemic. A targeted rule for just 3 categories (Crypto, Suspicious, ATM) would address 88% of total fraud exposure.
Peak Fraud Hour
2 AM
40.3% fraud rate
High-Risk Window
1–4 AM
3× avg fraud rate
Highest-Risk Amount
Over $1K
22.7% fraud rate
Fraud Rate % by Hour of Day Top 8 highest-risk hours
Fraud Rate % by Transaction Amount 5 amount tiers
Rule Recommendations:  Rule 1: Flag transactions >$500 between 1AM–4AM → estimated 35% exposure reduction.  Rule 2: Require 2FA for Crypto/Suspicious + amount >$500 → 62% exposure addressed.  Rule 3: Step-up auth for ATM withdrawals >$800 → 14% additional exposure covered. Combined impact: ~40–50% fraud exposure reduction with <5% false positive rate.

📊 Dashboard Analysis & Key Insights

🚨 Critical Risk Finding

Crypto and Suspicious Vendors account for just 16% of transaction volume but drive 62% of total fraud exposure ($828K of $1.63M). These two categories alone have a fraud rate above 56%, nearly 28× the industry benchmark. This is not a broad systemic issue; it is highly concentrated risk.

⏰ Time-Based Attack Pattern

Fraud peaks sharply between 1 AM – 4 AM with a 36–40% fraud rate, 3× the daytime average. Combined with transaction amounts over $500, this window accounts for a disproportionate share of exposure. A time-based rule alone is estimated to reduce exposure by 35% with minimal false positives.

✅ Recommended Action Plan

Three targeted rules address ~88% of total fraud exposure:
Rule 1: Flag Crypto/Suspicious + amount >$500 between 1–4 AM.
Rule 2: Require 2FA on Crypto/Suspicious categories + amount >$500.
Rule 3: Step-up auth for ATM >$800.
Combined estimated impact: 40–50% exposure reduction.

📈 Monthly Trend

The fraud rate has been consistently elevated all year (14.6%–20%), showing no seasonal decline. This rules out a one-off spike and confirms a structural vulnerability. The Jan and Nov dips (14.6%, 15.9%) may reflect temporary controls that didn't scale, worth investigating as a starting model.

💰 Amount Risk Profile

High-value transactions (>$1K) have a 22.7% fraud rate, 6× higher than transactions under $200. This amount-based signal is strong enough to act as a standalone trigger for step-up authentication, especially when combined with category or time-of-day signals.

🎯 Business Impact

The current fraud rate of 18.2% is 9× the industry benchmark of <2%. Bringing it to benchmark represents a potential $1.4M reduction in annual fraud losses. The concentration of risk in 3 categories means controls can be surgical, avoiding broad friction that would impact the 82% of legitimate transactions.